As a long time paying Dropbox customer, I’m quite accustomed to not having to to think much about saving my files in the cloud. It just happens. And so when I find myself in a situation where I have to use iCloud instead, I notice the differences.
It would seem that Apple has plans for iCloud to be the type of service customers depend on for their every day storage needs. From my experience, it’s not yet at a place where I can make it a major part of my computing setup.
iCloud is configured to fit Apple’s vision of simplified computer usage. So the file system is something not easily accessed by the user. Where as Dropbox is a complete sync of your file and folder structure, iCloud simply stores files by application and the user is not presented with the file system at all when saving or opening files.
I can admit that there are certain scenarios where this would work for me. And there are many people for whom this is adequate. But when I’m working on something that requires multiple files in different applications, I find myself wanting the “old way” to be available.
Two recent scenarios have been a trigger for me thinking about this subject again. I’ve been teaching adult Sunday school classes since January, so I’ve been using Keynote a lot. And this was about the same time that I started using Writer Pro on my iPad. The latter does not yet support Dropbox (it’s coming). And while the former can make use of Dropbox and the file system on OS X, the iOS version does not.
This really hit home for me when I was at TypeCamp in January. I really wanted to go over my slides on the plane ride home using my iPad. Being able to do so was great, but the steps required to get it there were onerous.
The task itself does not sound onerous in and of itself. But this only works with a small number of documents. If you have more than 10 files, this process is unfriendly.
You have to save the file to iCloud within the desktop version. Then, on your iPad, refresh the list of iCloud files. Once you see the one you’re working on, open it on the iPad. Not, now only is the process less than ideal, but you lose any sort of special formatting with your slide deck. Typography being the big area where you lose out.
All of this could be overcome if the benefit of reviewing and editing my slides were beneficial enough to be done on the iPad. But because it would cause me more work in the long run, I’ve not made the step.
Of course, this is only one application. And as slide shows are very personalized (or, they should be), perhaps it’s a poor example to use. But it’s simply one of the tasks where I’ve actually had the desire to use the iPad as a content creation device. And the experience was lacking overall.
The example is also more on the subject of creating with an iPad rather than iCloud storage. But without the one, the other is not required at all. I’ve simply continued using Dropbox with my slide decks rather than iCloud. There are no benefits to do so, only drawbacks at this point.
I certainly appreciate iCloud and the amalgamation of OS X and iOS. It’s made certain areas of my computing life much more lacking in friction. But the improvements have come at the same time as Dropbox (and other web services like Rdio), so it can be hard to differentiate between the improvements overall.
In the end, computing for a Mac user has been simplified. That’s a
good great thing.
We believe there’s so much more that your portable wireless speaker should do for you. That’s why we made the AXX 200.
The AXX 200 is a Bluetooth wireless speaker + Sound Blaster audio processor. This means a portable wireless speaker with power for real-time audio enhancement.
Intelligence. That’s what the AXX 200 brings to the table.
It’s for work, it’s for play.
It can be everything you need it to be.
A few recent trends in web design get under my skin. Any site that employs a heavy use of parallax, animations, or hijacks the natural scroll behaviour drives me batty. Although this is partially my own preference, these tactics can take away from the experience of the site visitor (user).
But is there still a place for animation and other enhancements in web design? I have been to the point where if I see any of these items employed, I would simply close the tab. But I’ve seen a few compelling arguments and examples lately that have me reconsidering my distaste for anything animated.
Fundamentally, a web page should be created on good writing and a well thought out architecture. It should be easy on the person reading the site; no difficult decisions should have to be made.
But once the foundation is in place (good writing, solid typography, a clean & sensible architecture, plus supplemental media like photos and video), what then? Is there a way to add a few flourishes with animations or other tactics? Maybe there is.
Although I see a lot of bad examples in the course of a week, there are some good ones out there. The Pencil site developed by Jonnie Hallman for Paper is a great one (no, not that Paper, the first one).
The design is very clean and attractive, it scrolls like butter (very important), and towards the end there’s a small bit of animation with the Pencil. It’s a small addition that adds to the core message of the page, rather than take away.
When used as more than just a subtle design detail, animation can provide cues, guide the eye, and soften the sometimes-hard edges of web interactions.
When the goal is to add to the experience, I think there’s a place for these tools (the on boarding experience with the recently launched Slack is another good example). But when they’re employed for the sake of using a fun piece of technology, it’s painfully obvious that your core message is lacking.
If I never see another copycat parallax site again, I’ll be a happier man. But with a slightly more open mind, I’ll be keeping my eye open for good applications of these tools in order to improve my own work.
Designing emails that look beautiful, render perfectly and drive strong response is increasingly difficult. That’s why Campaign Monitor compiled the top 100 emails of 2013 into a free eBook, alongside tips on design and content. The Top 100 Email Marketing Campaigns eBook features brands like Fitbit, SmugMug, Panic and includes:
Check out the free eBook at http://ift.tt/1dS4Ibp.
Campaign Monitor makes software that lets you create and send beautiful emails. Today more than 800,000 designers, agencies, and amazing companies across the globe rely on Campaign Monitor to manage their email marketing.
Well, what can I say about today’s sponsor? As a member of this team, I cannot endorse it enough. This fantastic group of people have poured themselves into creating a great product, but even more, an overall experience. If you send HTML email, you need to try Campaign Monitor.
All comments and opinions below are based on my time with Writer Pro for the iPad. I’ve not used the desktop version to this point.
It’s been 6 weeks since I purchased Writer Pro for my iPad. As a very happy iA Writer user, I was eager to give it’s successor a try. The concept of a writing workflow definitely appealed to me, albeit with a large grain of salt.
The feature set and announcement for this application excited me. Having firsthand experience with the previous version left me with a confidence in the people behind it. If anyone could take an already great writing experience and improve on it, it’s the team at iA.
I admit that it took me a while to jump in and make the purchase. After all, I’ve grown tired of paying for upgrades to apps I already own. On top of that, early reviews were a little scathing, despite what the App Store blurb and iA’s site had to say about it.
Without quoting anyone specific, the general sense was this:
What a waste of money! The various states of each document are just a change of font and colour! You lose your notes.
The basic complaint was this: Writer Pro took what iA Writer offered and added 4 different fonts and shades of colour to differentiate what phase of the writing workflow you were on, as well as syntax highlighting. And since the workflow seemed to not fit the needs of people, customers were dissatisfied.
To be fair, both Dropbox and Markdown support will be added. This has been clear from the launch.
Add to this the fact that Writer Pro was lacking two features of it’s predecessor (Dropbox integration and Markdown preview), early adopters seemed to feel like this was a bad $20 decision.
And I must admit I was a little skeptical that it would fit as well. As anyone who writes is aware, we all get to the end destination (a published piece of writing) in different ways. Software that claims to fit your workflow rather than forcing you to mold to its interface should usually be taken with a dose of skepticism. But again, my time with iA Writer allowed me to give the folks at iA the benefit of the doubt.
I can count the number of times I used App Store comments to evaluate a potential purchase on one hand. But this was one of them.
Near the end of December, I made the purchase and immediately started to use Writer Pro in place of Writer. I did so even though it had been confirmed that a document started in Notes mode would simply be in the exact same state when converted to Write mode. The font and colour of the icons change, but your content is exactly the same.
I wrote several blog posts and Sunday school lessons in Writer Pro. My flow was like this: create a new document, start plugging away, then get close to a finished product. Nowhere in there was changing the status of the document useful. I tend to take my close to finished priduct and put it into the environment it will live in. My site for blog posts, Keynote slides for adult Sunday school. I prefer to see how it looks in the end destination. Any tweaks are made there.
Suffice to say, my experience was like many others. Nothing in Writer Pro improved my writing experience. And the lack of Dropbox support and Markdown preview actually meant Writer Pro was a worse tool for me than Writer. To be fair, I expected this. A tool with a specific workflow will always take getting used to. You do have to evaluate your workflow, then adapt to the tool (hopefully only a slight adaptation).
The overall reaction to this aspect of the service seems to have taken iA a little aback. They’ve since changed their marketing of the app on their site, stating that the workflow is intended to be document based. What does that mean exactly? Simply this: you create a document for your notes & research, then a new one when you’re ready to write.
Fair enough, but it only raises more questions for me. How do you refer to your notes when writing? Did they intend users to create yet another version of the same document for editing? Reading? The more I think of the vision, I can only assume the intention was that people would buy versions for each device. You refer to your notes on your iPhone or iPad while you write on the desktop. The application seems not to have been intended as a purchase for only one device. Their introductory blog post indicates this may be the case:
Mostly, the iPhone was used for taking notes. In direct opposition to that popular “consumption device” claim, the iPad is a relentless drafting machine. Editing functionality like Syntax Control will prove most useful on a Mac.
So, having time to use Writer Pro (on one device) and read through the documentation again, I come away with the feeling that the application was intended for a particular type of writing. The vision is for long form pieces, books and papers perhaps. The workflow certainly seems a little lacking when it comes to blog posts or other types of shorter content.
I’ll be straight up; I’ve not even used this once. Not that it couldn’t be useful … I think it could. But it hasn’t been a part of my workflow in the past and I haven’t yet made myself change my writing habits.
My focus when considering purchasing Writer Pro for use as my primary writing environment was the workflow aspect. In time, my opinion may change as I (slowly) put this part of the application to use. There are others who feel this aspect of Writer Pro does not actually improve your writing.
But I’m going to give it a chance. It doesn’t hurt to have this type of information available.
To be perfectly honest, I have hopes that this app will be a part of my toolset in the future. My time using iA Writer assures me that the talented folks at iA know what they’re about. Writer Pro will improve and I can imagine it being my main writing tool at some point.
Just not yet.
I’ve observed developer Jared Sinclair via his blog over the past several months. Like many things online, I can’t quite recall what took me there the first time, but I subscribed and have enjoyed reading his site. He has a passion for good software and this comes through in his writing.
Over the months, he’s been posting about his then-to-be-upcoming RSS reader. That app, Unread, was available last week. Although happy with Reeder, I was interested to see what Jared had come up with.
Upon seeing Jared’s announcement that it was available, I checked the app out. I was surprised to see that it was for the iPhone only. Jared posted shortly after his design decisions for Unread … you read that and I get the impression that he’s the type of developer that creates apps I would enjoy.
But as a reader, I only use my phone to read when I’m in between places. And that reading is very shallow, a cursory look at items that would be consumed in more depth at some later time. So I had hoped that there would be an iPad version as well.
My other thought when first looking through the screenshots and reading the app description was that Unread was intended for articles to be read in-app. When I say this, I mean that this particular feed reader is designed in a way where you consume the content in the application. And while I love Whitney and the design is lovely, I’ve long been of the opinion that an author’s works should be viewed in the environment that he/she created.
And so I closed the app store link and went on my way.
8 days later, I must say that I purchased Unread and have been very happy with that decision. What led to this change of mind? First, there was the review of my buddy Shawn Blanc. I respect his opinion when it comes to software and he made a few points that kept me thinking about Unread.
It’s not that there’s anything in particular. There’s just a simple elegance to it. The app is well designed and nice to use.
When I finally purchased the app, the first few minutes proved Shawn’s points to be true. The app is clean and easy to use. It’s a very pleasing experience overall.
But what caught my attention the most was the lack of stress I felt when reading with Unread. Let’s be honest; when it comes to reading blog articles, stress seems like an odd word. A feeling that should not apply. But I believe it is a symptom of the environment. In many of my RSS apps, it feels like an inbox, one I need to prune every so often. This amidst the busyness of my work queue, my task manager, Twitter, and IM notifications. I need to get through that list of unread items quickly.
Because of the design, Unread does not have the same feeling. Why? Because Jared understands modern apps and computing environments and did not want to repeat it. In his design decisions article, he alluded to this point:
I think it’s important to reiterate what I wanted Unread to be. I didn’t make it to be a feature-for-feature replacement for an app you may already be using. That would make Unread merely a thin coat of paint on old ideas.
But before that, months earlier, he shared his vision for the app while he was still building it.
Most RSS apps are patterned after email. Noisy parades of dots, dates, and tags trample over their screens. Their source lists look like overflowing inboxes instead of stately tables of contents. Toolbars bristling with options obscure the text. Putting it bluntly, using these apps feels like work.
Well said. And his solution:
I made Unread because I wanted to get back to a more deliberate style of reading. I designed it for times of quiet focus. With warm typography and a sparse interface, it invites me to return to the way I used to read before I fell into the bad habit of skimming and forgetting.
In my initial trial of Unread, I was enjoying what Jared was describing (although I had forgotten his words above until I started writing this post). But something still felt off. There was a slight discomfort, like a t-shirt that has a great design, but doesn’t fit quite right.
I examined this closely. I had look at my RSS habits to understand why I felt uncomfortable (beyond the regular discomfort of trying a new app). It became obvious quickly. My RSS feeds have three different types of content; articles to read, items to process, and items of an educational purpose, to be archived for later reference.
The first type work perfectly in Unread, which is, as Jared intended, a lovely reading environment. The second type do not fit well in this app. I’m talking about my Dribbble feed, my office porn, and font examples in the wild. These are items that are, for lack of a better word, processed. They are not read at all and I realized are best handled on my desktop.
The third tend to go to my read-it-later service to collect dust and die … but they simply also need to be processed and handled differently than my articles to read.
Once I recognized the different types of items that I had collected via RSS over the years, the solution was obvious.
And so I now use Unread to enjoy good reading from authors I admire. I will sometimes read the article in Whitney in Unread, sometimes in the built-in browser with the owner’s intended environment. Both are enjoyable in the app and I recommend it to anyone.
Just remember Jared’s vision if you decide to the $2.99 plunge:
The point of Unread is to give you an opportunity to change the way you read. Its design can only take you halfway there. I urge you to prune your subscriptions down to the writers you care about most.
That’s basically what I did. I unsubscribed from items that I was processing in RSS. I still do that, but I simply use a group Bookmark in Safari to run through those every day. If I read an item I want to refer to later in Unread, I add it to Reading List (an in-app option — thanks, Jared!).
Reading in Unread is a joy. I’m glad I gave it a chance.
As mentioned last week, the Campaign Monitor team got together recently for our annual meet up. As the team grows, having a meet up like this becomes increasingly expensive, both financially and administratively. It’s also absolutely vital.
Although we live in an incredible time from a technological perspective, there is still no replacement for face to face discussion. Full on interaction between two (or more) human beings requires being present in the same physical space. So while having remote positions allows you to hire the best people regardless of location, being able to get the best work from those people is only possible though the best interaction possible.
I’m so very blessed to work for a team that understands this.
In the past year, our team has grown a good bit. And even though I’ve worked along side many of these people for chunks of each day for months, there is no price you can put on having a real voice to go with someone’s “chat voice”.
That moment when you meet in person and then spend an hour in conversation is essential. Suddenly, you realize that the person who seems so lively and animated in the chat room is actually pretty mellow. And maybe a little shy. It changes your perception. It’s not good or bad, just … different.
You are able to understand that person more fully. To know them. IRL.
Mandy Brown recently talked about this subject in Making Remote Teams Work. Having contributed my thoughts to her research, I was glad to see that, as a whole, people are mostly in agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of remote working.
One item that most interested me was her point that in a hybrid team, it’s best if everyone spends at least some time in the remote role. She states:
It’s necessary for everyone on a team to adapt to remote work, even those who continue to commute to a traditional office each day.
The designers & and developers on a team do not contribute to the end product by themselves. For the user, the experience is a part of the product. And so the entire team contributes to the end product, and the support team especially so.
So, so true. At Campaign Monitor, we are a mixed team, with the majority of our designers, developers, and sys admins in the Sydney head office. Basically, those who contribute most to the application are in the same place. This has been an area where we’ve needed to improve. And I’m glad to see that during the 18 months I’ve been there, the team (our leadership specifically) has strived to improve. And improve we have.
As Mandy states, overcommunicating is essential. Or, said more simply, communicate as if you were remote, even if you’re not. The entire team will benefit from it.
Since joining Twitter in 2007, nothing has become more clear than the fact that we only see a part of the person online. When I meet coworkers or Twitter friends in person, I’m always struck by the fact that the avatar I look at every day is a two dimensional view. Their real face, in its three dimensional beauty, is the same, yet so very different at the same time.
This reality goes beyond the physical, obviously. As mentioned above, the way a person carries themselves in the chat room can be vastly different from how they speak in a crowded room or on a quiet bus ride. The non-verbal bits of communication, the idiosyncrasies of each of us, add to the overall picture. Suddenly, the avatar becomes a much more clear version of this person in your life.
It’s so true for those you look up to as well. I love coming up to those who’ve admired from afar, saying hello, and then being hit with the realization that they’re so very real and less intimidating than expected. Being very good at what you do does not equate to looking down on others, on me specifically. It took some face to face meetings for me to realize that.
I’m so glad I did!
I can say that the Internet and Twitter relationships altered the path of my career. For that I am thankful. And now that I can work from anywhere, I’ll be doing my best to make sure those people become more real to me through meeting in person.
I want the whole picture.
During my high school and college years, I learned quickly that there were kids who were much better basketball players that I was. Playing with them was often an exercise in humility and frustration. And I took every chance I could to make sure I was included in the games with people better than me.
Why? Because it made me a better player. And fast.
Although our nature can be to run from situations like this, we can all learn to relish them as well. The moments of frustration are the catalyst to improvement. And while humility is a trait you want to stick around, the frustration will disappear over time.
Our annual Campaign Monitor took place just over a week ago on Oahu. I was once again reminded of this fact of life over the course of the weekend, talking with teammates and during a couple of meetings. For a small team (< 75), we have a ridiculous amount of talent! And when I look at the work of my teammates and what they’ve accomplished, I feel like I’m back on the court again, playing with people who are miles ahead of me.
I wouldn’t have it any other way!
With the new year just started, everyone is full of new ideas and plans for each. And when it comes to planning a new idea, you need to be sure that content is first.
And for your web projects, Jumpchart is a great way to make sure your content gets the attention it requires. The team at Paste have created one of the best tools around for planning your web projects, or those for your clients.
In 2014, don’t make the mistake of ignoring what should be the heart of your ideas.
You don’t have to live to long in this life to see that the mind is a powerful thing. Never mind the science, trillions of neurons and synapses and all the rest. No, think instead of state of mind. The ability to influence outcomes purely from how you perceive them.
I’ve spent most of my 38 years as a glass half empty kind of guy. I’m not talking a donkey Eeyore level of negativity, but complaints have always tended bubble up from within and then proceed to roll off my tongue.
I was thinking this last night as I shovelled another 15 CM of heavy, wet snow for the seeming umpteenth time this year. How easy it is to look at what’s wrong with a situation instead of what’s right. Thinking of how time consuming snow removal is comes immediately rather than recognizing how the exercise has benefitted this old body, how beneficial this time is to a mostly sedate lifestyle.
That’s just one easy example; sadly, it has a lot of siblings.
Clearing snow to begin the New Year was a great opportunity to reflect (another benefit of clearing snow is it’s like taking a shower … the mind is free to roam) on this reality. I’ve noticed it a lot in our children — complaining is a habit that comes naturally for humans. A factory default, if you will. As I’ve begun teaching them, correcting and guiding, it’s helped me to recognize the weakness in myself. And so I intend to make a change this year.
Like Patrick Rhone, I prefer intentions to resolutions. Semantics? Possibly. But we’re talking about the power of perception here. Intent matters.
And I definitely want to see this change occur in my children, but I have selfish motivations as well. I know I’ll be better off and more joyful with a proper mind set. And the benefits of a consistent positive outlook are multitude. Here’s a couple that come to mind.
Complaining makes it easier for others to be negative as well. I’ve seen this in previous work places, as well as my home. When one person starts to complain, it can encourage complaining or a negative attitude of the other people around.
I’d like to be the person who’s consistently buoying people’s spirits instead.
Seth Godin coined the term Lizard Brain.
The resistance grows in strength as we get closer to shipping, as we get closer to an insight, as we get closer to the truth of what we really want. That’s because the lizard hates change and achievement and risk.
Complaining makes never launching more of a possibility. This is negativity at its finest. I’ve let a few projects go in recent years, taking longer than I should to get them out into the open. Part of that is due to simply not believing in them enough.
2014 is a year that will change!
Although this world can be terribly painful and heart wrenching at times, there’s so much to be thankful for each and every day. I know that’s easy to say from the comfort of my North American life, but I do believe that life itself is a gift. Being created in the first place is a blessing in and of itself.
Every day affords me the opportunity to praise my Creator for His work, including my own existence. Complaining is saying to Him, “Your work is not that great.”
If I want to see change in my children, to see a positive mental outlook in their lives, it starts with me. I hope that 2014 is the year I stop complaining by default.